Tag Archive: arikaree

Windows into unseen waters

A typical scene for drilling a groundwater monitoring well. The big boom arm on the back of the truck runs the drilling augers. The drill bits used are hollow stem augers and allow for a hole to be drilled in the soil and the well to be constructed inside the augers. This is really entertaining stuff here. The cows could barely break away and only lost interest when the rancher brought them their lunch.

A typical scene for drilling a groundwater monitoring well. The big boom arm on the back of the truck runs the drilling augers. The drill bits used are hollow stem augers and allow for a hole to be drilled in the soil and the well to be constructed inside the augers. This is really entertaining stuff here. The cows could barely break away and only lost interest when the rancher brought them their lunch.

For most people water is just something that comes out of a faucet in their house. We pay little attention to how it gets there. For some of us, though, water and especially groundwater is a continual point of focus. Groundwater moves almost as slowly as paint dries, yet it’s super fascinating to a few of us and important to all of us.

Water is extremely important to life on this planet. Finding freshwater is a challenge to many of the inhabitants on earth, particularly in poorer regions. Even though the surface of the earth is roughly 70 percent covered by water, the vast majority of this water is salty ocean water. Freshwater amounts to just three percent of the Earth’s total water, and about a third of freshwater is groundwater. Groundwater is an important part of our tiny usable water supply, and we need to monitor it.

The remainder of the soil boring with the PVC well casing inside the hole.

The remainder of the soil boring with the PVC well casing inside the hole.

I am a hydrologist here at NEON, which means I work with surface water (like that in lakes and streams) and groundwater. My background is in hydrogeology, which means I focus on the water that we can’t easily observe: the water that’s held within the soils and rocks below our feet. We can’t observe it directly, so to study it, we put fancy straws into the ground.

In mid-February, while many other people were wooing their significant others for Valentine’s Day, we were hard at work establishing the first portion of NEON’s groundwater observation well network. The first wells are part of the Central Plains region (Domain 10) and are situated around the Arikaree River in eastern Colorado. The site is a pristine grasslands area which has a gentle topography of rolling hills with a small portion of the Ogallala Formation present along the southern boundary.

NEON collaborated with the U.S. Geological Survey to install the wells at the site. Initial characterization of the site, performed by the USGS, used a combined geophysics approach to attempt to define the anticipated depth that we would need to drill the wells. In other words, we used electricity to look for water. For those of you who haven’t used electrical resistivity (a geophysics method) to study aquifers before, here’s how it works: We apply a small amount of electrical current to the soil though a pair of electrodes and measure the resulting electric potential at a separate set of electrodes. Several electrodes are positioned in a line and the current and electrode pairs are automatically swapped around many times through all the electrodes. If you do this enough, swapping the current pair of electrodes and potential pair, what you get are a set of measurements that yield a map of the soil’s ability to conduct electricity. We use a fancy numerical modeling technique called an “inversion” which takes the raw data that we collect from the electrodes and computes what the subsurface architecture must look like to yield the electrical signals we collected.

The reason this works so well is that water conducts electricity and we can “image” underground soils and soil moisture this using this technique. More accurately, we can use this technique to look for differences in the electrical conductance of the soil layers and make inferences as to where there is water or at least a shift in the underlying layers. We also make some eye-catching images.

The results of the inversion model for the site. The upper red and pink layers are the unsaturated dry soils and the top of the yellow band is where the water table is. The transition between the green and light blue layers is the thick clay layer before you reach bedrock. This image was the start of defining how deep the observation wells would need to be drilled to reach water.

The results of the inversion model for the site. The upper red and pink layers are the unsaturated dry soils and the top of the yellow band is where the water table is. The transition between the green and light blue layers is the thick clay layer before you reach bedrock. This image was the start of defining how deep the observation wells would need to be drilled to reach water.

Based on the geophysics analysis, we estimated that the thickness of the soil layer was about 30 feet. While drilling the wells we reached a thick clay layer at approximately 30 feet depth, marking the end of our drilling and also confirming the interpretations from the geophysics. At this site all the wells were drilled to approximately 30 feet deep as we encountered the clay layer at the same depth. The plan was to have a screened section of well (where the groundwater can enter and exit) long enough to capture the full seasonal and long-term oscillation of the groundwater table (fully water saturated soils).

Here is a quick conceptual drawing of the well.

Here is a quick conceptual drawing of the well.

The water table, or the minimum distance between the ground surface and available groundwater, fluctuates due to seasonal variations of input (i.e. rain and snow melt) and extraction (i.e. irrigation and drinking water). The wellxs were constructed to allow for the full range of seasonal oscillation in the groundwater table to be observed. During the drilling operations we observed the water table at about 5 feet below the ground surface and anticipated that the water table could lower by up to 15 feet below current level if irrigation increased and rain and snow pack in the mountains decreased over the next few decades. Historic information on the groundwater level fluctuations around the stream was not available before we installed the wells. So we opted to use a slotted pipe 15 feet in length and positioned from 10 to 25 feet below ground surface to allow for substantial fluctuations in the water table and still have the well intersect it.

We opted to install a protective steel casing around the PVC casing. A barbed wire fence was installed around the casing to keep the cattle away when they are being ranched in the research site area of the property.

We opted to install a protective steel casing around the PVC casing. A barbed wire fence was installed around the casing to keep the cattle away when they are being ranched in the research site area of the property.

And finally, we have NEON’s first groundwater observation well.

In the coming months the NEON aquatic team will be installing sensors in the wells and in the stream to begin prototyping activities of the sensors and their data streams. Once we install water level sensors in the wells we’ll be able to track the oscillation of the groundwater table and will begin to establish the historical groundwater record in this region. The data collected through this network will establish a database that will allow local farmers to track the generalized effects of irrigation on groundwater levels in the region. This data will also be useful to the greater scientific research community as a part of the puzzle piece for examining continental scale ecological drivers and responses, among many other potential studies.

Stay tuned for more developments!

Permanent link to this article: http://www.neonnotes.org/2012/04/windows-into-unseen-waters/

When ecosystem engineers throw a wrench in your gears

Imagine the scene: a sunny spring day on the plains of eastern Colorado, grasses gently swaying in the breeze, and a clear, gurgling stream winding its way across the landscape. Standing on the stream bank, suddenly there’s a loud splash, and you see a huge, dark shape gracefully plunge into the stream in front of you. Your mind irrationally flips through a list of mental images (you were, after all, watching River Monsters on the Discovery Channel the night before). And then you come to your senses, it’s just a beaver. Wait a minute, a beaver? In a tiny stream on the plains of eastern Colorado?

Sure, beavers can succeed just about anywhere by altering their environment. This has earned them the nickname “ecosystem engineers.” Beavers are known to significantly alter aquatic habitats by damming streams and rivers, turning them into ponds and wetland habitats. This changes the habitat dramatically, and is a factor that NEON Aquatic scientists must consider.

The Aquatic (AQU) program at NEON will collect data on ecological responses to physical and chemical drivers in freshwater systems, and much of that data can be collected only in the presence of flowing water. NEON Aquatic scientists are choosing stream sites across the country that are shallow enough to wade across, yet have flowing water throughout the growing season. Beavers, however, can transform our small study streams into a series of small ponds.

A lovely, flowing stream.  Contractors measure stream discharge at the Arikaree study site in the springtime, during high flows. Photo by Keli Goodman

A lovely, flowing stream. Contractors measure stream discharge at the Arikaree study site in the springtime, during high flows. Photo by Keli Goodman

Beaver dams are just some of the many challenges we’ve faced since we began work on characterizing a small stream in the central plains of Colorado last spring. The first major challenge was to find such a stream with continuously running water, as most streams dry during the hot, dry summer months. While the Arikaree River is known to go dry in this area, it maintains water for the majority of the year, so it’s a better choice than some of the more ephemeral streams in the area.

The site that was chosen is approximately 50 miles north of Burlington, Colorado and is located on Nature Conservancy land that is managed as a working cattle ranch. The Arikaree River continues to flow northwest into the Republican River in Nebraska. At the site, the stream is small and shallow with a sandy bottom that can easily be waded. The stream is home to frogs, fish, insects, plants, algae, and a few larger mammals too…

The cattle are always very interested in the scientists.  That is, until they realize that we are only scientists, and not there to bring them food.  Photo by Stephanie Parker

The cattle are always very interested in the scientists. That is, until they realize that we are only scientists, and not there to bring them food. Photo by Stephanie Parker

Now on to challenge number two: the cattle. The stream flows across a working cattle ranch, where there are plenty of cows who love to rub their backs on trees and on site markers that we placed near the stream. They also like to walk across the stream, make their own paths (sometimes across the stream), leave manure in and near the site, and follow us around because they think that we are bringing them food. Luckily for us, once the cattle realize we have no food for them, they decide we are really boring and leave us alone. Currently, we do not leave equipment or instruments at the stream site between visits; however, soon enough we will install sensors and other equipment that stay in the stream. The NEON Aquatics team and engineers are currently devising solutions to keep the equipment safe from curious cattle.

Where did the stream go?  The Arikaree study site in mid-summer.  Photo by Bill Schenderlein

Where did the stream go? The Arikaree study site in mid-summer. Photo by Bill Schenderlein

Challenge number three: summertime in the central plains. If you have ever been to eastern Colorado in the summer, you know that it is mostly dry and hot, with the occasional thunderstorm. Our contractors visited the site approximately every 2 weeks throughout the summer, and found that in addition to sampling stream water and aquatic plants, they routinely brought home ticks. Lots and lots of ticks. Why so many ticks? Because the vegetation surrounding the stream was growing so tall and thick that they had to wade through deep grasses to get to the stream. In addition, the grasses were growing over the top of the stream channel, making the water difficult to find in some places. Luckily the contractors had thought ahead and marked the channel with long pieces of rebar.

And finally, the challenge you’ve all been waiting for, challenge number 4: beavers. Just when we thought we had made it through the trials of our first summer of NEON aquatic site characterization, an early summer drought reduced the stream flow to a trickle. The water that remained was no longer clean and clear. It had become muddy and stagnant, restricted to a few pools along the reach, with little flowing water between them. Soon thereafter, the field contractors informed us that construction had begun on the Arikaree River. Hooray, we’ve been waiting for construction to start! But, this wasn’t NEON-sanctioned construction. The local beaver family, including the very same beaver that had hopped innocently into the stream in front of me back on that spring day, had begin to build a series of dams along the entire study reach. And so the old saying “busy as a beaver” rang true: the beavers built so many dams that what remaining flow there was in the channel completely stopped, rendering the Arikaree River a series of small pools. The beavers have ingeniously made a series of step pools to ensure constant water in the stream section connecting several larger beaver ponds along the Arikaree River. Good for the beavers, bad for NEON Aquatics. With no flowing water, we are not able to sample aquatic chemistry and streamflow as planned.

Photo by Steve

Photo by Steve

And so, we find ourselves in the midst of a competition for one of the few stretches of running water left in eastern Colorado. We found a nice stream, survived the curious cattle, made it through tick season, and now are faced with a large rodent whose ability to engineer a landscape to its benefit is second only to humans. Because the beavers are a natural part of the aquatic ecosystem, NEON will not remove them from the stream. Instead, we will continue to do what work we can in the study reach, and wait for high spring flows, fed by snowmelt, to return consistently flowing water to the stream. We hypothesize that spring flooding may naturally clear the smaller beaver dams along the study reach, returning the stream to the flowing, gurgling stream that we first visited back in the spring.

We anticipate that the beaver will inhabit our study reach annually as the channel begins to dry, usually early fall. Thus, we are planning to structure our sampling seasonally: the flowing water part of the year from spring to late summer, and no-flowing water part of the year (we are calling this the “beaver season”), from early fall through winter. As the NEON Aquatics team moves on to construct new sites across the country, who knows what other challenges we may face. What’s next, alligators?

Permanent link to this article: http://www.neonnotes.org/2011/11/when-ecosystem-engineers-throw-a-wrench-in-your-gears/